User talk:Ajh16

This user may have left Wikipedia. Ajh16 has not edited Wikipedia since 20 April 2019. As a result, any requests made here may not receive a response. If you are seeking assistance, you may need to approach someone else.

Welcome!

Hello, Ajh16, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages that you might find helpful:

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your messages on discussion pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or ask your question on this page and then place {{helpme}} before the question. Again, welcome! Acalamari 17:29, 14 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Your rollback request

Hi! I regret that I must inform you that your request for the rollback permission has been denied. You can discover why by checking the archives at Wikipedia:Requests for rollback/Denied/July 2008#ajh16. SoxBot X (talk) 17:30, 14 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks

I would just like to say thanks for reverting the vandalism on my page. However, you might want to warn the offending editors on their talk page, using templates found at Wikipedia:Template messages/User talk namespace. In any case, keep up the good work. Artichoker^[talk] 19:06, 14 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Question

Although you were declined rollback yesterday based on inexperience, a look through your recent contributions shows that you know how to use undo correctly, and are familiar with what vandalism is and isn't. Do you still want rollback rights? I can grant them right now if you want them. Tell me what you think. Thanks. Acalamari 17:02, 15 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Rollback granted. Just remember that rollback should only be used to revert vandalism, and that misuse of the tool can lead to its removal. For practice, you may wish to see Wikipedia:New admin school/Rollback. Good luck. Acalamari 18:47, 15 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Wow!

You just installed Huggle, yet you're extremely fast! Shapiros10 ^{contact me}_{My work} 19:05, 15 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks

Thanks for the rollback permissions and the compliment on using Huggle. I'm used to being an IRCop on an IRC network so I'm used to quickly dealing with this kind of stuff. The time I have to spend on it will vary from time to time, but it is a big help to be able to make the best use of my time by having a powerful tool like Huggle at my disposal now. It definatly makes life much easier. My compliments to its creators.Ajh16 (talk) 19:23, 15 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Huggle

Following this edit, which was a clear misuse of Huggle, I have removed your Huggle access (although not, for the moment, rollback). Normally I wouldn't take such a drastic action for a "first offence", but quite frankly an account with a history of less than 24 hours should not be using a tool like this anyway. – iride scent 19:26, 15 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Re: Requesting reconsideration of Huggle block

I won't reconsider; in my opinion there's no legitimate reason an editor with less than 50 edits would be using Huggle. Assuming you're a good-faith new editor, you need to demonstrate you can use the rollback feature correctly before using something this powerful; the analogy would be, I wouldn't let you drive a semi-trailer truck until you'd passed the test to drive a car. You may be able to persuade someone else to re-enable it in which case I won't stand in their way. (In the event that you're not a good-faith new editor then there are obvious reasons not to allow you access to a powerful high-speed editing tool.) – iride scent 20:25, 15 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

regarding your last post on Iridescent's talkpage, I have said (in two places) that I really hope I'm wrong and that it is just a bizarre coincidence. The (unfortunate in your case) timing got my spidey-sense tingling. A long time socker gets indeffed, one of his hallmarks was asking for rollback way too soon in his editing history for his reincarnation. He was indeffed right around the time you showed up at RFR. As a new editor. Asking for rollback. Again, I hope I'm wrong. Keeper | 76 | what's in a name? 20:38, 15 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

My talkpage is a mess (it usually is), so I'll post here. I'm starting to think that I've misjudged you (again, bad timing isn't your fault, but it is what it is...). Give it a week or so without huggle, poke around, revert some things, add some things. See if this is a place you could get used to. If so, I'll unprotect your .css file so you can enable huggle (or post to Iridescent for another set of eyes). I've said all along that I hoped I was wrong. I will be elated to be wrong about you. Hit up my talkpage if you need any help with anything. Cheers, Keeper | 76 | what's in a name? 22:19, 15 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Hi!

Hello - thanks for getting in contact! I'm interested to see that (presumably) there are 16 AJHs but I got AJHW on its own. Perhaps someone could write a page on how people choose their usernames - apart from vandals, misleading names etc! AJHW (talk) 13:49, 16 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

PPF

Hi Ajh! I restored the proper version of the PPF page, which has been around for more than four years, as a proper disambiguation page. (Please be cautious about adding speedy-delete tags -- it's worthwhile to look at the article history before doing so -- one would hope that the deleting admin would look at histories before hitting the switch, but in my experience that's not 100% the case.) Thank you for your patrolling work! Antandrus (talk) 16:53, 21 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Sorry about that, my history didn't load properly for some reason so I did not see any entries prior to the 2 spam ones. I have reverted the other associated edits that the tagging made. Thanks for catching it before I could get back to it.Ajh16 (talk) 16:55, 21 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

No problem at all! all is well. :) Antandrus (talk) 16:55, 21 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Princess Tsuguko of Takamado

61.208.183.235 is still at it...--GagHalfrunt (talk) 10:50, 22 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Re: double revert

Yeah, I hit escape, but I wasn't fast enough, so I clicked "undo" on both the revert and the warning, and it said it undid my warning as well as the revert, I guess it lied. I just closed Huggle, and it did this. You should be good, now. J.delanoy ^gabs _adds 16:08, 22 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

The Rockwood, Tennessee vandal

Hi there, I was just going to issue him a lvl 3 warning, re your last warning regarding that very article. :) De728631 (talk) 16:01, 4 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

It isn't like he made us wait very long to get to final anyway. :\ Ajh16 (talk) 16:27, 4 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Wikipedia:WikiProject Persepolis F.C. invite

Please accept this invitation to join the Persepolis F.C. WikiProject, a WikiProject dedicated to improving all articles associated with the Persepolis FC. Simply click here to accept!

CSD tags

U1 is always a useful one where it's in your own userspace..._Gb^T/c 20:34, 5 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

PS - Apologies, misread the names, hence my earlier post about G7, now replaced! _Gb^T/c 20:34, 5 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Input request

You have contributed to article The Really Big Show (formerly Rizzo on the Radio). This article is currently being considered for deletion. Please consider providing input at the article's discussion page: Wikipedia:Articles_for_deletion/The_Really_Big_Show. Levdr1lp (talk) 22:37, 8 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom elections are now open!

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 13:55, 24 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom Elections 2016: Voting now open!

Hello, Ajh16. Voting in the 2016 Arbitration Committee elections is open from Monday, 00:00, 21 November through Sunday, 23:59, 4 December to all unblocked users who have registered an account before Wednesday, 00:00, 28 October 2016 and have made at least 150 mainspace edits before Sunday, 00:00, 1 November 2016.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2016 election, please review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 22:08, 21 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2017 election voter message

Hello, Ajh16. Voting in the 2017 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 10 December. All users who registered an account before Saturday, 28 October 2017, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Wednesday, 1 November 2017 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2017 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 3 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2018 election voter message

Hello, Ajh16. Voting in the 2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 2 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2018 election voter message

Hello, Ajh16. Voting in the 2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 3 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]